MULTI-SCALAR SPATIAL INEQUALITIES IN SKI TOURISM INFRASTRUCTURE: A MAUP-INFORMED EXAMINATION OF ROMANIAN SKI AREAS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI251230006M

Keywords:

Modifiable Areal Unit Problem, spatial disparities, ski tourism, Romania

Abstract

The study aims to quantify the differences in key ski infrastructure attributes at four territorial levels (development regions, districts, localities, and individual slopes) and assess the impact of scale on changes in these differences (the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem [MAUP]) and its subsequent implications for planning practice. The dataset refers to 2024 and comprises six infrastructural indicators collected for 229 slopes in 72 localities across 20 districts and six development regions. The study employs a multi-level quantitative framework based on the aggregation of spatial data across four hierarchical territorial levels and the construction of standardized composite indices for ski slope infrastructure (ISP), ski lift transport infrastructure (ISI), and their disparity, using min–max normalization within the interval [0,1]. Spatial inequalities and their scale-dependent variability are subsequently evaluated through descriptive spatial statistical analysis and GIS-based multi-scalar comparison (ArcGIS Pro), enabling the empirical assessment of MAUP-related scale effects in Romanian ski tourism infrastructure. The findings demonstrate a clear increase in disparities at lower spatial levels, confirming a pronounced scale effect linked to MAUP. At the regional level, such micro-scale inequalities become largely concealed, generating an impression of spatial homogeneity that is not evident at lower spatial scales. The results highlight the importance of spatial scale in evaluating infrastructural development disparities and provide a planning-relevant framework for mountain tourism destinations, supporting more effective investment targeting, the prevention of resource misallocation, and the mitigation of spatial inequalities affecting destination performance, accessibility, and environmental sustainability.

Article metrics

References

Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the UK. Environment and Planning A, 41(3), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40208

Avdić, A., & Avdić, B. (2023). Center and Periphery in Bosnia and Herzegovina – Social and Spatial Indicators of Regional Disparities. Folia Geographica, 65(2), 103–126. https://www.foliageographica.sk/unipo/journals/2023-65-2/693/

Baggio, R. (2014). Complex tourism systems: A visibility graph approach. Kybernetes, 43(3/4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2013-0266

Boc, E., Filimon, A. L., Mancia, M.-S., Mancia, C. A., Josan, I., Herman, M. L., Filimon, A. C., & Herman, G. V. (2022). Tourism and Cultural Heritage in Beiuș Land, Romania. Heritage, 5(3), 1734–1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030090

Bornhorst, T., Ritchie, J. R. B., & Sheehan, L. (2010). Determinants of tourism success for DMOs & destinations: An empirical examination of stakeholders' perspectives. Tourism Management, 31(5), 572–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.06.008

Boros, A., & Korcsmáros, E. (2024). Development Prospects of Rural Tourism Along the Danube. Key Factors of Satisfaction and the Role of Sustainability. Folia Geographica, 66(2), 5–35. https://www.foliageographica.sk/unipo/journals/2024-66-2/723/

Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2011). Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.580586

Brouder, P. (2020). Reset redux: Possible evolutionary pathways towards the transformation of tourism in a COVID-19 world. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1760928

Buzzelli, M. (2020). The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP). In A. Kobayashi (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (2nd ed.; pp. 169–173). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10406-8

Chen, X., Ye, X., Widener, M. J., Delmelle, E., Kwan, M.-P., Shannon, J., Racine, E. F., Adams, A., Liang, L., & Jia, P. (2022). A systematic review of the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) in community food environmental research. Urban Informatics, 1(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44212-022-00021-1

Ciangă, N., & Deszi, Șt. (2007). Tourist Planning. University Publishing House.

Coles, T., Hall, C. M., & Duval, D. T. (2006). Tourism and post-disciplinary inquiry. Current Issues in Tourism, 9(4–5), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.2167/cit327.0

Cressie, N. (1996). Change of support and the modifiable areal unit problem. Geographical Systems, 3, 159–180.

Dark, S., & Bram, D. (2007). The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 31(5), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133307083

Deac, L. A., Herman, G. V., Gozner, M., Bulz, G. C., & Boc, E. (2023). Relationship between Population and Ethno-Cultural Heritage—Case Study: Crișana, Romania. Sustainability, 15(11), Article 9055. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119055

Deng, H., Liu, K., & Feng, J. (2024). Understanding the impact of the modifiable areal unit problem on urban vitality and its built environment factors. Geo-spatial Information Science, 27(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2024.2336593

Dredge, D., & Jenkins, J. (2006). Tourism Planning and Policy. John Wiley.

Duque, J. C., Laniado, H., & Polo, A. (2018). S-maup: S-maup: Statistic test to measure the sensitivity to the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. PLoS ONE, 13(11), e0207377. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207377

Faludi, A. (2013). Territorial cohesion, territorialism, territoriality, and soft planning: A critical review. Environment and Planning A, 45(6), 1302–1317. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45299

Fotheringham, A. S., & Wong, D. W. S. (1991). The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 23(7), 1025–1044. https://doi.org/10.1068/a231025

Framke, W. (2002). The destination as a concept: A discussion of the business-related perspective versus the socio-cultural approach in tourism theory. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 2(2), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250216287

Fyall, A., Garrod, B., & Wang, Y. (2012). Destination collaboration: A critical review of theoretical approaches to a multi-dimensional phenomenon. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 1(1–2), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2012.10.002

Gehlke, C. E., & Biehl, K. (2012). Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the correlation coefficient in census tract material. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 29(185), 169–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1934.10506247

Graham, S., & Healey, P. (1999). Relational concepts of space and place for planning: Exploring the utility of spatial metaphors and metaphors for spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 7(5), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319908720542

Hall, C. M. (2008). Tourism planning: Policies, processes and relationships (2nd ed.). Pearson.

Hall, C. M., a Page, S. J. (2014). The geography of tourism and recreation: Environment, place and space (4th edition). Routledge.

Haugland, S. A., Ness, H., Grønseth, B., & Aarstad, J. (2011). Development of tourism destinations: An integrated multilevel perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2010.08.008

Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. Routledge.

Herman, G. V., Grama, V., Buhaș, S., Garai, L. D., Caciora, T., Grecu, A., Gruia, A. K., Hudea, O. S., & Peptenatu, D. (2021). The analysis of the ski slopes and the degree of economic dependence induced by winter sports tourism. The case of Romania. Sustainability, 13(24), Article 13698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413698

Herman, G. V., Blaga, L., Filimon, C., Caciora, T., Filimon, L., Herman, L. M., & Wendt, J. A. (2024). Spatial Distribution of Relationship between Historical Monuments and Tourism: The Case Study of Bihor County in Romania. Land, 13(5), Article 668. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050668

Herman, G. V., Bucur, L., Filimon, C. A., Herman, M. L., Nistor, S., Tofan, G.-B., Stupariu, M., Bacter, R. V., & Caciora, T. (2025). Exploring the Relationships Between Bicycle Paths and Urban Services in Oradea, Romania. Urban Science, 9(9), Article 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9090373

Herman, G. V., Gal, A., Pantea, P., Vîșca, S., Herman, L. M., Filimon, C., & Josan, I. (2025). Spatial Distribution of Ski Slopes in Romania. Geosport for Society, 22(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.30892/gss.2208-133

Holt, D., Steel, D. G., Tranmer, M., & Wrigley, N. (1996). Aggregation and ecological effects in geographically based data. Geographical Analysis, 28(3), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00933.x

Hudson, S. (2003). Sport and Adventure Tourism. Routledge.

I-Tour. (n.d.). National Project of Tourist Information and Promotion. Retrieved March 10, 2025, from https://www.i-tour.ro

Matlovič, R., & Matlovičová, K. (2025). The metamodern shift in geographical thought: Oscillatory ontology and epistemology, post-disciplinary and post-paradigmatic perspectives. Folia Geographica, 67(1), 22–69. https://www.foliageographica.sk/unipo/journals/2025-67-1/737/

Matlovičová, K. (2015). Značka územia [Place brand]. Prešovská univerzita.

Matlovičová, K. (2024). The triadic nexus: Understanding the interplay and semantic boundaries between place identity, place image, and place reputation. Folia Geographica, 66(1), 69–102. https://www.foliageographica.sk/unipo/journals/2024-66-1/697/

National Authority for Tourism. (2025). List of Approved Ski Slopes. Retrieved March 01, 2025 from https://se.situr.gov.ro/OpenData/OpenDataList?type=listaPartii

National Institute of Statistics. (2025). Population by domicile on July 1 by age and age groups, sexes, counties and localities. National Institute of Statistics. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from http://statistici.insse.ro:8077/tempo-online/#/pages/tables/insse-table

National Agency for Cadastre and Real Estate Advertising. (2025). Administrative Boundaries. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://geoportal.ancpi.ro/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=faeba2d173374445b1f13512bd477bb2

Openshaw, S. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. Geo Books.

Openshaw, S., & Taylor, P. J. (1979). A million or so correlation coefficients: Three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In N. Wrigley (Ed.), Statistical methods in the spatial sciences (pp. 127–144). Pion.

Pike, S., & Page, S. J. (2014). Destination marketing organizations and destination marketing: A narrative analysis of the literature. Tourism Management, 41, 202–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.09.009

Prideaux, B. (2000). The role of the transport system in destination development. Tourism Management, 21(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00079-5

Prouse, V., Ramos, H., Grant, J. L., & Radice, M. (2014). How and when scale matters: The modifiable areal unit problem and income inequality in Halifax. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 23(1), 61–82.

Richmond, A., Wolfel, R., Fairfield, Ch., Grannis, R., & Grazaitis P. (2026). Fragile Stability: The Impact of Geopolitical Interests and Environmental Security on Burkina Faso’s Political Landscape. Folia Geographica, 68(1), 5–36. https://www.foliageographica.sk/2026-68-1/782

Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978

Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Fratesi, U. (2004). Between development and social policies: The impact of European structural funds in objective 1 regions. Regional Studies, 38(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400310001632226

Saarinen, J., Rogerson, C. M., & Hall, C. M. (2017). Geographies of tourism development and planning. Tourism Geographies, 19(3), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2017.1307442

Scott, N., Baggio, R., & Cooper, C. (2008). Network Analysis and Tourism: From Theory to Practice. Channel View Publications.

Ski in Romania. (n.d.). Ski in Romania. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from www.ski-in-romania.com

Szilágyi, F., Bujdosó, Z., & Szabó, P. P. (2025). Tourism Resilience in the Face of Covid-19: Insights from Accommodation Enterprises in North-Western Romania. Folia Geographica, 67(2), 70–95. https://www.foliageographica.sk/2025-67-2/767/

Wong, D. W. S. (2004). The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP). In D. G. Janelle, B. Warf, & K. Hansen (Eds.), WorldMinds: Geographical perspectives on 100 problems (pp. 571–575). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2352-1_93

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Matlovicova, K., Herman, G. V., Deszi, S., & Blaga, L. (2026). MULTI-SCALAR SPATIAL INEQUALITIES IN SKI TOURISM INFRASTRUCTURE: A MAUP-INFORMED EXAMINATION OF ROMANIAN SKI AREAS. Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 76(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI251230006M

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.