EXPLORING THE SPATIALIZATION OF CULTURE: PERSPECTIVES FROM SLOVENIAN ETHNOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI2403399SKeywords:
human geography, culture, spatial turn, anthropology of space and place, SloveniaAbstract
The article presents observations on the intricate processes of localizing peoples and cultures, drawing on their spatial mapping, a practice known since antiquity. The introducing part outlines general views on the causal relationship between culture and environment. The Enlightenment put forward the hypothesis of environmental determinism, which provided a rationale for linking people, cultures, and geographies well into the 20th century, particularly in anthropogeography and culture-area research. The isomorphism of space/place and culture characterized research until the late 20th century when the postmodern turns called it into question. The theory of practice and the spatial turn proved particularly influential in anthropology and ethnology. In this field, the central concept of culture has been deconstructed; this has stimulated debates about ethnography as a genre of “writing culture” and fieldwork as a locally grounded research practice. The second part of the text shows how Slovenian ethnology in the 20th century pursued cultural area research shared with other European regional or national ethnologies that focus on the national territory. However, research has not shown a clear correspondence between cultural and ethnic/national boundaries. In this respect, ethnology has maintained a critical distance from cultural essentialization. On the other hand, it has not particularly reflected upon space; space has functioned as the natural environment, the obvious background of culture. In this respect, the reception of the spatial turn brought a particular sensitivity to studying spatial practices and experiences and refining research methodologies.
Article metrics
References
Abram, S., & Bajič, B. (2022). Perception Against: Reflecting Ethnographically on the Sensory, Walking, and Atmospheric Turns. Etnološka tribina, 52(45), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.15378/1848-9540.2022.45.04
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
Augé, M. (1992). Non-Lieux: Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité [Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity]. Seuil.
Bajič, B. (2020). Nose-talgia, or olfactory remembering of the past and the present in a city in change. Ethnologia Balkanica, 22, 61–75.
Bajič, B., & Abram, S. (2019). Čutnobiografski sprehodi: Med antropologijo čutov in antropologijo digitalnih tehnologij [Sensobiographic Walks: Between Anthropology of the Senses and Anthropology of Digital Technologies]. Glasnik Slovenskega etnološkega društva, 59(1), 27–38. https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-IRIKDLJH/518a5515-db46-4f1e-b5fb-edb3568381b0/PDF
Baskar, B. (2013). Kako geografi, antropologi in literarni teoretiki pripovedujejo o prostorskem obratu [How geographers, anthropologists, and literary scholars narrate the spatial turn]. Comparative Literature, 36(2), 27–42. https://ojs-gr.zrc-sazu.si/primerjalna_knjizevnost/article/view/6233/5892
Baš, A. (Ed.). (1980). Slovensko ljudsko izročilo [Slovenian Folk Tradition]. Cankarjeva založba.
Baš, F. (1965). O karakterologiji prebivalstva v Štajerskem Podravju [On the characteriology of the population in Styrian Drava region]. Časopis za zgodovino in narodopisje, 1, 163–175. https://www.sistory.si/publication/7068
Belaj, V., Domaćinović, V., Muraj, A., & Vinšćak, T. (Eds.). (1989). Etnološki atlas Jugoslavije: karte s komentarima [Ethnological Atlas of Yugoslavia: Maps with Annotations]. Centar za etnološku kartografiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu & Hrvatsko etnološko društvo.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Anchor Books.
Bogataj, J., & Hazler, V. (1996). Regionalizacija [v etnologiji] [Regionalization [in ethnology]]. In M. Javornik, D. Voglar, & A. Dermastia (Eds.), Enciklopedija Slovenije [Encyclopedia of Slovenia, Vol. 10, p. 148]. Mladinska knjiga.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Brozović Rončević, D., & Štokov, I. (2017). Etnolingvistička ustaživanja i GIS (lingvistička geografija i etnološka kartografija) [Ethnolinguistic studies and GIS (linguistic geography and ethnographic cartography)]. Hrvatski dijalektološki zbornik, 21, 63–89. https://hrcak.srce.hr/186146
Clifford, J. (1988). The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Harvard University Press.
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. University of California Press.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. University of California.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
De Waal Maljefit, A. (1974). Images of Man: A History of Anthropological Thought. Alfred A. Knopf.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison. Vintage Books.
Fox, R. G. (Ed.). (1991). Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. School of American Research Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books Inc.
Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997a). Culture, Power, Place: Ethnography at the End of an Era. In A. Gupta & J. Ferguson (Eds.), Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology (pp. 1–29). Duke University Press.
Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997b). Discipline and Practice: “The Field as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology“. In A. Gupta & J. Ferguson (Eds.), Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of Field Science (pp. 1–46). Duke University Press.
Hannerz, U. (1996). Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. Routledge.
Harris, M. (1968). The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Herzfeld, M. (1997). Cultural Intimacy: Social Poetics in the Nation-state. Routledge.
Herzfeld, M. (2001). Anthropology: Theoretical Practice in Culture and Society. Blackwell Publishers.
Hodgen, M. T. (1964). Early Anthropology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Inda, J. X., & Roslado, R. (2008). The Anthropology of Globalization: A Reader (2nd ed.) Blackwell Publishers.
Ingold, T. (2011a). Being Alive: Essay on Movement, Knowledge and Descriptions. Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2011b). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge.
Jezernik, B. (1991). O novem vzgojnoizobraževalnem programu [About the new curriculum]. Glasnik Slovenskega etnološkega društva, 31(1–2), 13–16. https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-T4PNC7TJ
Johler, R. (2020). Die Karten der Ethnographen: Volkskunden, ethnographische Karten, volkskundliche Atlanten (1850–1980) [Ethnographers‘ maps: Ethnographies, ethnographic maps, ethnographic atlases (1850–1980)]. In R. Johler & J. Wolf (Eds.), Beschreiben und Vermessen: Raumwissenschaft in der östlichen Habsburgermonarchie im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert [Describing and Measuring: Spatial Science in the Eastern Habsburg Monarchy in the 18th and 19th Centuries] (pp. 583–625). Frank & Timme.
Kearney, M. (1995). The Local and the Global: The Anthropology of Globalization and Transnationalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.002555
Könenkamp, W.-D. (1988). Natur und Nationalcharakter: Die Entwicklung der Ethnographie und die frühe Volkskunde [Nature and national character: The development of ethnography and the early Volkskunde]. Ethnologia Europaea, 18(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.16995/ee.1353
Kremenšek, S. (1974). Etnološkoa topografija slovenskega etničnega prostora [Ethnological topography of the Slovenian ethnic territory]. Traditiones, 3, 189–191. http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-7UIDY1WA
Kremenšek, S. (Ed.). (1986). O razmerju med geografijo in etnologijo [About the relationship between geography and ethnology]. Oddelek za geografijo & Znanstveni inštitut Filozofske fakultete.
Kuper, A. (1999). Culture: The Anthropologists‘ Account. Harvard University Press.
Kuret, N. (1984). Maske slovenskih pokrajin [Masks of Slovenian Regions]. Cankarjeva založba.
Lefebvre, H. (1974). La Production de L’Espace [The Production of Space]. Anthropos.
Low, S. (2017). Spatializing Culture: The Ethnography of Space and Place. Routledge.
Low, S. M., & Lawrence-Zúñiga, D. (Eds.). (2003). The Anthropology of Space and Place: Locating Culture. Wiley-Blackwell.
Ložar, R. (1944). Narodopisje, njegovo bistvo, naloge in pomen [Ethnography, its essence, tasks and relevance]. In R. Ložar (Ed.), Narodopisje Slovencev I [Ethnography of Slovenians I] (pp. 7–20). Založba Klas.
Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the World Systems: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. J. (1986). Anthropology as a Cultural Critique. University of Chicago Press.
Melik, A. (1935–1936). Slovenija I.–II.: Geografski opis [Slovenia I.–II.: Geographical Description]. Slovenska matica.
Murko, M. (1896). Narodopisna razstava češkoslovanska v Pragi l. 1895 [The Ethnographic exhibition in Prague 1895]. Letopis Matice slovenske, 75–137. https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-R23ZHP7Q
Muršič, R. (2006). Nova paradigma antropologije prostora: Prostorjenje in človeška tvornost [A new paradigm in anthropology of space: Spatialization and human agency]. Glasnik Slovenskega etnološkega društva, 46(3–4), 49–54.
Muršič, R. (2019). Izkušnja improvizacije v objemu algoritmov: Digitalna vmesnost in preddigitalna trirazsežnost vsakdanjega življenja [Experiencing Improvisation in the Embrace of Algorithms: Digital In-beetweenness and Pre-digital Three-dimensionality of Everyday Life]. Glasnik Slovenskega etnološkega društva, 59(1), 17–26. http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-1QU13SIZ
Natter, W. (2005). Friedrich Ratzel’s spatial turn. In H. van Houtum, O. Kramsch, & W. Zierhofer (Eds), B/ordering Space (pp. 171–186). Routledge.
Novak, V. (1956). O bistvu etnografije in njeni metodi [On the essence of ethnography and its method]. Slovenski etnograf, 9, 7–16. https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-SIKUGIHN
Novak, V. (1958). Struktura slovenske ljudske kulture [The Structure of Slovenian folk culture]. In Razprave SAZU II/4 (pp. 5–31). Slovenska akademija znanosti in umetnosti.
Novak, V. (1960). Slovenska ljudska kultura: Oris [Slovenian Folk Culture: An Outline]. Državna založba Slovenije.
Peternel, L., & Podjed, D. (2024). Container life in post-earthquake Croatia. Focaal. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2024.100702
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2015). Digital Ethnography: Principle and Practice. Sage.
Podjed, D. (2020). Antropologija med štirimi stenami [Anthropology behind four walls]. Založba ZRC.
Podjed, D. (2021). Renewal of ethnography in the time of the COVID-19 crisis. Sociology and Space, 59(219), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.59.0.10
Podjed, D. (2024). Krizolacija: Znanstveno branje o izoliranih ljudeh [Crisolation: A scholarly reading on isolated people]. Založba ZRC/ZRC Publishing, ZRC SAZU & Cankarjeva založba Založništvo. https://doi.org/10.3986/9789610508656
Podjed, D., & Muršič, R. (2021). To be or not to be there: Remote ethnography during the crisis and beyond. Etnolog, 31, 35–51. https://www.etno-muzej.si/en/etnolog/etnolog-31-2021/to-be-or-not-to-be-there-remote-ethnography-during-the-crisis-and-beyond
Przybylski, L. (2021). Hybrid Ethnography: Online, Offline, and In Between. Sage.
Rapoport, N., & Overing, J. (2000). Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key Concepts (1st ed.). Routledge.
Rogelja Caf, N., & Ledinek Lozej, Š. (2023). Hodopisi: Zbirka etnografskih esteem z metodološkimi premises o hoji in pisanju [Footnotes: Ethnographic essays with methodological reflections on walking and writing]. Založba ZRC. https://doi.org/10.3986/9789610507086
Sheperd, N., Ernsten, C., & Wisser, D.-J. (2018). Walking Seminars: Embodied Research in the Emergenet Anthropocene. University of the Arts Amsterdam.
Slavec Gradišnik, I. (2000). Etnologija na Slovenskem: Med čermi narodopisja in antropologije [Ethnology in Slovenia: Between the reefs of ethnography and anthropology]. Založba ZRC, ZRC SAZU. https://doi.org/10.3986/9616358200
Slavec Gradišnik, I. (2001). Podobe pokrajin in njihovo ozadje: Kulturna območja na Slovenskem [Regional images and their background: Slovene cultural regions]. In M. Hudelja, V. Hazler, & I. Slavec Gradišnik (Eds.), Podobe pokrajin 1956–1970: Etnološka fototeka Vilka Novaka [Images of landscapes 1956–1970: The ethnological photo archive of Vilko Novak] (pp. 25–59). Slovensko etnološko društvo.
Slavec Gradišnik, I. (2016). Recepcija Jovana Cvijića v slovenski etnologiji [Reception of Jovan Cvijić in Slovenian Ethnology]. Glasnik Etnografskog Instituta, 64(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1601011S
Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. Verso.
Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace. Blackwell.
Stocking, G. W., Jr. (1982). Race, Culture, and Evolution: Essays in the History of Anthropology. University of Chicago Press.
Šmitek, Z. (1991). Kam z antropologijo? [What about anthropology?]. Glasnik Slovenskega etnološkega društva, 31(1–3), 16–18. https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ASX74NT4/6549da57-acbc-4891-8f6c-b7794261d40c/PDF
Vermeulen, H. F. (2015). Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German Enlightenment. University of Nebraska Press.
Werlen, B. (1987). Gesellschaft, Handlung und Raum: Grundlagen handlungstheoretischer Sozialgeographie [Society, Action and Space: Foundations of Action-Theoretical Social Geography]. Franz Steiner Verlag.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.