• Milan Djordjević University of Niš, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Department of Geography, Niš
  • Aleksandar Radivojević University of Niš, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Department of Geography, Niš
  • Ranko Dragović University of Niš, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Department of Geography, Niš
  • Ivan Filipović University of Niš, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Department of Geography, Niš




earthquake intensity zones, population, vulnerability, developing countries


Earthquake effects can be distinctly different in two different countries even if the earthquake has the same level of intensity. Loss and damage caused by the earthquake will be much less in developed countries than in developing countries. Due to its inability to prevent and cope with disasters developing countries are in the focus in this article. This paper presents an approach for detecting the most and the least vulnerable countries of the world and the distribution of their population within different earthquake intensity zones. There is also a summary of the change in world population during the 25‑year period (1990–2015), within continents and earthquake intensity zones as well as a comparison between continents. The population growth is unevenly distributed and highest in the zone with probable maximum intensity VIII. In relation to the World population by earthquake intensity zones, the developing countries have the lowest share of its population among the zone with most destructive earthquakes.

Article metrics


Bolt, B. (2005). Earthquakes: 2006 Centennial Update — The 1906 Big One (5th Ed.). W. H. Freeman and Company, 10–14, 293–297

Brewer, C. A. (2013). ColorBrewer 2.0 [Online] Available from: http://colorbrewer2.org/

Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University; and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). (2005). Gridded Population of the World (GPW) [Data file], Version 3. Palisades. NY: CIESIN, Columbia University. Available from http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw.

Frankenberg, E., Laurito, M., & Thomas, D. (2015). Demographic impact of disasters. In J. D. Wight (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed.). Elsevier. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.31059-5

Gates, A, E., Ritchie, D. (2007). Encyclopedia of Earthquakes and Volcanoes (3rd Ed.). New York. Retrieved from http://1.droppdf.com/files/loH4O/encyclopedia-of-earthquakes-and-volcanoes.pdf

Harding, L. (2001, February 17). Indian quake widens rifts between the castes. The Guardian. Available from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2001/feb/17/naturaldisasters.climatechange

Haynes, B. E., Freeman, C., Rubin, J, L., Koehler, G. A., Enriquez, S. M., & Smiley, D. R. (1992). Medical response to catastrophic events: California’s planning and the Loma Prieta earthquake. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 21(4), 368–374. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82652-6

Kolbe, A, R., Hutson, R, A., Shannon, H., Trzcinski, A., Miles, B., Levitz, N., Puccio, M., James, L., Noel, J, R., & Muggah, R. (2010). Mortality, crime and access to basic needs before and after the Haiti earthquake: a random survey of Port-au-Prince households. Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 26(4), 281–297. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13623699.2010.535279

Kusky, T. (2008). Earthquakes: Plate Tectonics and Earthquake Hazards. New York: Facts On File, Inc., New York.

Munich Re. (2011). NATHAN world map of natural hazards. Retrieved from http://www.munichre.com/site/corporate/get/documents/mr/assetpool.shared/Documents/0_Corporate%20Website/_Publications/302-05972_en.pdf

Naghii, M, R. (2005). Public health impact and medical consequences of earthquakes. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 18(3), 216–221. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892005000800013

Oxfam. (2005). The tsunami's impact on women. Available from http://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/oxfam/bitstream/10546/115038/1/bn-tsunami-impact-on-women-250305-en.pdf

Özerdem, A. (2006). The mountain tsunami: afterthoughts on the Kashmir earthquake. Third World Quarterly, 27(3), 397–419. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436590600587846

Özerdem, A., Barakat, S. (2000). After the Marmara earthquake: lessons for avoiding short cuts to disasters. Third World Quarterly, 21(93), 425–439. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713701047

UNEP. (2001). United Nations Environment Programme Earthquake Intensity Zones [Data file]. Retrieved from http://geodata.grid.unep.ch/options.php?selectedID=58&selectedDatasettype=16

United Nations. (2012). Statistical Annex: Country Classification statistics] Available from http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wesp/wesp_current/2012country_class.pdf

USGS. (2014.) Earthquakes with 1,000 or More Deaths 1900–2014. Retrieved from http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/world_deaths.php

World Bank Independent Evaluation Group (2006). Hazards of Nature, Risks to Development — An IEG Evaluation of World Bank Assistance for Natural Disasters. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank, Washington. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/396321468161661084/pdf/366150Hazards0and0risks01PUBLIC1.pdf




How to Cite

Djordjević, M., Radivojević, A., Dragović, R., & Filipović, I. (2016). EXPOSURE TO EARTHQUAKES — DISTRIBUTION AND CHANGE OF THE WORLD’S POPULATION WITH REGARD TO DISPOSITION OF SEISMIC ACTIVITIES. Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 66(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1603353D