ESTIMATING THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF THE ECOTOURISM DESTINATION: THE CASE OF TRA SU MELALEUCA FOREST NATURAL PARK IN VIET NAM

Authors

  • Huynh Truong Huy Can Tho University, School of Economics, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Can Tho City
  • Luu Thi Ngoc Thi Can Tho University, School of Economics, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Can Tho City
  • Nguyen Tri Nam Khang Can Tho University, School of Economics, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Can Tho City
  • Nguyen Thi Tu Trinh Can Tho University, School of Economics, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Can Tho City

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI2303379H

Keywords:

ecotourism, travel costs, visitors, Tra Su Melaleuca Forest, Viet Nam

Abstract

In this article, the application of the Individual Travel Cost Method (ITCM) aims at providing a deeper insight into visitors’ preferences and their expenses on marketed and non-marketed services when travelling to the Tra Su Melaleuca Forest Natural Park, an ecotourism destination in An Giang Province of Viet Nam. The empirical findings from the survey of 237 visitors in 2022 showed that the frequency of trips to this recreational site was 1.3 per year on average and relied strongly on the travel costs. Additionally, the estimate of tourism revenues for 2022 of this site was 82,3 billion Viet Nam Dong (VND; equivalent to 3,5 million USD). Meanwhile, its economic value calculated by the ITCM application reaches 206,2 billion VND (or 8,8 million USD). It is obvious that a greater economic value over the monetary amount of revenue also raises several ideas of managerial implications dedicated to the recreational site. It includes building a marketing team for developing recreational services and digital marketing performance, expanding tour services like transportation, lodging, local guides. Finally, enabling local people to engage in dialogues, decision-making, and interest shares is also necessary for the sustainable development of ecotourism.

Article metrics

References

An Giang Provincial People's Committee Portal. (2023). An Giang tổng kết hoạt động ngành Văn hoá, Thể thao, và Du lịch năm 2022 và triển khai phương hướng, nhiệm vụ năm 2023 [An Giang provincial summary on the performance of Culture, Sports, and Tourism industry in 2022 and planning orientation, mission for 2023]. https://angiang.gov.vn/wps/wcm/connect/an+giang+portal-vi/sa-tintuc/an-giang-tong-ket-hoat-dong-nganh-van-hoa-the-thao-va-du-lich-nam-2022-va-trien-khai-phuong-huong-nhiem-vu-nam-2023

Arinta, D., Sumarmi, Budijanto, & Susilo, S. (2023). Development of integrated and sustainable community based eco-tourism on Sipelot beach, Indonesia. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 46(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.46102-996

Blaine, T. W., Lichtkoppler, F. R., Bader, T. J., Hartman, T. J., & Lucente, J. E. (2015). An examination of sources of sensitivity of consumer surplus estimates in travel cost models. Journal of Environmental Management, 151, 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.033

Brown, F., & Hall, D. (2008). Tourism and Development in the Global South: the issues. Third World Quarterly, 29(5), 839–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802105967

Cheung, L. T. O., & Jim, C. Y. (2014). Expectations and willingness-to-pay for ecotourism services in Hong Kong’s conservation areas. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2013.859183

Ezebilo, E. E. (2016). Economic value of a non-market ecosystem service: an application of the travel cost method to nature recreation in Sweden. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 12(4), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2016.1202322

Fennell, D. A. (2020). Ecotourism. Routledge.

Hellerstein, D. M. (1991). Using Count Data Models in Travel Cost Analysis with Aggregate Data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(3), 860–866. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242838

Hill, R., Loomis, J., Thilmany, D., & Sullins, M. (2014). Economic Values of Agritourism to Visitors: A Multi-Destination Hurdle Travel Cost Model of Demand. Tourism Economics, 20(5), 1047–1065. https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2013.0323

Huong, L. H., Thuy, B. L., & Phuong Linh, N. T. (2020). Promoting Participation in Local Natural Resource Management through Ecological Cultural Tourism: Case Study in Vam Nao Reservoir Area, An Giang Province, Vietnam. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55(6), 863–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620935426

Hwang, K., & Lee, J. (2018). Antecedents and Consequences of Ecotourism Behavior: Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals, Ecological Belief, Willingness to Pay for Ecotourism Services and Satisfaction with Life. Sustainability, 10(3), Article 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030789

Iarossi, G. (2006). The Power of Survey Design: A User’s Guide for Managing Surveys, Interpreting Results, and Influencing Respondents. The World Bank.

Khanh, P. T., Vinh, N. P., & Ngoc, T. T. H. (2021). An Evaluation of The carbon stocks of The Tra Su Cajuputi Forests in An Giang Province of Southern Vietnam. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(3), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.93.10145

Leh, F. C., Mokhtar, F. Z., Rameli, N., & Ismail, K. (2018). Measuring Recreational Value Using Travel Cost Method (TCM): A Number of Issues and Limitations. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 1381–1396. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/5306

Liu, W.-Y., Chen, P.-Z., & Hsieh, C.-M. (2019). Assessing the Recreational Value of a National Forest Park from Ecotourists’ Perspective in Taiwan. Sustainability, 11(15), Article 4084. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154084

Pablo-Romero, M. d. P., & Molina, J. A. (2013). Tourism and economic growth: A review of empirical literature. Tourism Management Perspectives, 8, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2013.05.006

Parsons, G. R. (2017). Travel Cost Models. In P. A. Champ, K. J. Boyle, & T. C. Brown (Eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (pp. 187–233). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8_6

Purwoko, A., Nurrochmat, D. R., Ekayani, M., Rijal, S., & Garura, H. L. (2022). Examining the Economic Value of Tourism and Visitor Preferences: A Portrait of Sustainability Ecotourism in the Tangkahan Protection Area, Gunung Leuser National Park, North Sumatra, Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(14), Article 8272. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148272

World Travel & Tourism Council. (2022). Travel & Tourism Economic Impact 2022. Global trends. https://wttc.org/Portals/0/Documents/Reports/2022/EIR2022-Global%20Trends.pdf

Yee, J. Y., Loc, H. H., Le Poh, Y., Vo-Thanh, T., & Park, E. (2021). Socio-geographical evaluation of ecosystem services in an ecotourism destination: PGIS application in Tram Chim National Park, Vietnam. Journal of Environmental Management, 291, Article 112656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112656

Downloads

Published

2023-12-16

How to Cite

Truong Huy, H., Thi Ngoc Thi, L., Tri Nam Khang, N., & Thi Tu Trinh, N. (2023). ESTIMATING THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF THE ECOTOURISM DESTINATION: THE CASE OF TRA SU MELALEUCA FOREST NATURAL PARK IN VIET NAM. Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 73(3), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI2303379H

Issue

Vol. 73 No. 3 (2023): Journal of the Geographical Institute "Jovan Cvijic" SASA

Section

Research note

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.