THE ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCES ON THE ECONOMY: A STUDY OF THE BALKAN EU MEMBER STATES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1502123VKeywords:
human capital, economic indicators, NUTS 2, South-Eastern EuropeAbstract
In this paper we analyze the impact of the quality of human capital on the main economic indicators of South-Eastern Europe countries [SEE] at the NUTS 2 level. The subjects of this research are the human capital indicators of regional competitiveness. The quality of human capital depends largely on the age structure of the population and the quality of education. Those regions, which have the highest percentage of the working-age population and highly educated people, are able to achieve higher productivity and gain a competitive advantage over other regions. As main indicators of the quality of human capital we identified: population; persons aged 25-64 with tertiary education attainment; students in tertiary education and participation of adults aged 25-64 in education and training and human resources in science and technology. As main economic indicators, we identified: regional gross domestic product; employment and income of households. The aim of this paper is to determine whether there is a correlation between the indicators of the quality of human capital and economic indicators. As a main methodology we have used the correlation coefficient which shows interdependence of the analyzed indicators. As part of our analysis, we consider only EU member states that belong to the SEE countries: Slovenia, Croatia, Romania, Bulgaria and Greece. We conclude that in all countries there is a high multiple correlation coefficient between the indicators human resources in science and technology, number of students and employment.
Article metrics
References
Commission of the European communities. (1988). Council Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 of 24 June 1988 on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments. OJ L 185, 15.7.1988. Brussel.
Deutsch, K., Burrell, S., & Kann, R. (1957). Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
EUROSTAT (2014). Retrived from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/region_cities/regional_statistics/data/database Update: feb. 2014.
EUROSTAT (2014). Retrived from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistical-atlas/gis/viewer Update: feb. 2014.
Gilbert, A. (1988). The new regional geography in English and French-speaking countries, Progress in Human Geography, 12, 208-228.
Hotz-Hart, B. (2000). Innovation Networks, Regions and Globalization. The Oxford Book of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hurrell, A. (1995). Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics. Review of International Studies, 21(4), 545-566.
Lengyel, I. (2004). The pyramid model: enhancing regional competitiveness in Hungary. Acta Oeconomica, 54(3), 323–342.
Kitson, M., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2004). Regional Competitiveness: An Elusive yet Key Concept?, Regional Studies, 38(9), 991–999.
Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics, MacMillan, London.
Nye, J. (1965). Patterns and Catalysts in Regional Integration. International Organization, 19(4), 870-884.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2001). The New Economy: Beyond the Hype. Paris. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/2/26/2380634.pdf
Puhle, H. J. (1999). Regions, Regionalism and Regionalization in 20th Century Europe. Frankfurt, Retrieved from www.uni- de/fb03/hjpuhle
Radulović, D. (2013). Regional Policy and Regional Development-European Union. HESPERIA edu. Supported by Ministry of Regional Development and Local Government, SDC, BMZ, GIZ. p. 413, Novi Sad.
Russett, B. (1967). International Regions and the International System. A Study in Political Ecology, Chicago: Rand-MacNally.
Schwab, K., & Porter, M. E. (2007). The Global Competitiveness Report 2007-2008. World Economic Forum. Geneva, Switzerland.
The IMD World Competitiveness Center (2000). The World Competitiveness Yearbook, Lausanne.
Vuković, D., & Wei, L. (2010). Regional competitiveness: the case of western China. Journal of Geographical institute „Jovan Cvijić“ SASA 60(1), 107-124. Retrieved from: http://scindeks.nb.rs/article.aspx?query=ISSID%26and%268691&page=7&sort=8&stype=0&backurl=%2fissue.aspx%3fissue%3d8691
Vuković, D., Jovanović A., Grubišić, Z. (2012). Economic aspects of regionalization of European countries. Journal of Geographical institute „Jovan Cvijić“ SASA 62(1), 31-48. Retrieved from:http://www.gi.sanu.ac.rs/rs/izdanja/zbornik/pdf/062_1/gijc_zr_62_1_004_vukovic_jovanovic_grubisic.pdf
Vuković, D. (2013a). Model of regional competitiveness: theoretical-methodological analysis and possibilities of application in Serbia. Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Economics, University of Kragujevac.
Vuković, D. (2013b). Correlation analysis of indicators of regional competitiveness: The case of the Republic of Serbia. Economic Horizons, 2013, 15(3), 201-215 Retrieved from: www.horizonti.ekfak.kg.ac.rs/sites/default/files/Casopis/2013_3/EN/Darko_Vukovic_EN.pdf
World Economic Forum (2011). The Global Competitiveness Report 2011–2012. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_Report_2011-12.pdf
Zarić, S. & Vuković, D. (2010). Regional competitiveness as a factor making investors. Journal: Institutional change as a determinant of economic development of Serbia in 2010. February 26. 2010, Faculty of Economics, University of Kragujevac. pp. 151–162
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.