MULTIFACETED APPROACH TO NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: ETHNOLOGY, GEOGRAPHY, CULTURE

Mikhail Slipenchuk; Elena Vorobyevskaya; Segey Kirilov; Alisa Telelekova

doi:10.2298/IJGI1603449S

Authors

Mikhail Slipenchuk Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Moscow
Elena Vorobyevskaya Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Moscow
Segey Kirilov Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Moscow
Alisa Telelekova Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Moscow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1603449S

Keywords:

multifaceted approach, natural resource management, ethnology, geography, culture

Abstract

Nowadays, the issue of interaction between man and nature is one of the most pressing challenges. One of the aspects of this interaction, as well as one of the prior scientific directions and use of natural resources, is natural resource management. A limited amount of many resources and the limits of environmental capacity of nature raise questions of equity to the interests of different generations, which implies the need to decide on the optimal use of natural resource potential of territories currently and in the future. The complex nature of the relationships that form the structure of resources management as a complex system, dictates the need for a comprehensive approach to its study. System analysis is this type of approach. It allows holding studies of the functions of resources management and identifying problems to its development.

Article metrics

References

Kalutskov V. N. (2008). The landscape in the cultural geography (Landshaft v kul'turnoi geografii). Moscow: Novyi Khronograf. (in Russian).

Kalutskov V. N. (2006) Ethnic and cultural landscape studies. Bulletin of Moscow University. Geography, 2, 6–12. (in Russian).

Klokov K. B. (1997) Traditional nature of the North: the concept of conservation and development. Ethnogeography and ethnoecological research. Issue 5. St. Petersburg. (in Russian).

Kozlov, V. I. (2005). On some problems of ethnic ecology. In V. I. Kozlov, A. N. Yamskov, N. I. Grigulevich (Eds.) Ethnoecological aspects of the spiritual culture (pp. 15–33). Moscow: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology (in Russian).

Krasovskaya T. M. (1998) Cultural landscape of the Far North of Russia as a basis for sustainable development. (Kulturnii landshaft raionov krainego severa Rossii kak osnova ustoichivogorazvitiyaregiona) Cultural landscape: Problems of theory and research methodology (Kulturnii landshaft: voprosi teorii i metodologii issledovanii), 45–47 (in Russian).

Miagkov S. M. (2002) Social ecology. Moscow: Urban ecology (in Russian).

Naprasnikov, A. T., Ragulina, M. V., Kalep, L. L., Korytnyi, L. M., Parfenov, V. M., Saveleva, I. L., Vlasova, N. V., Ponomarev, G. V., Oleinik, N. P., Romanova, M. V., Chukmasov, V. V. (2005). Territories of traditional nature management in East Siberia: geographical aspects of scientific substantiation and analysis. Novosibirsk: Nauka. (in Russian).

Vedenin Yu. A. (1997) Essays on Geography Art. St. Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin. (in Russian).

Vorobyevskaya E. L. & Evseev A. V. (2010). The history of the formation of the cultural landscape of the Khibiny and Lovozero massifs. International scientific conference “InterCarto-InterGIS — 16” Sustainable Development of Territories: GIS theory and practical experience. Rostov-on-Don, Russia; Salzburg, Austria. (in Russian).