PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF THE URBAN PLUVIAL FLOODS RISK—CASE STUDY OF POREČ (CROATIA)

Authors

  • Silvija Šiljeg University of Zadar, Department of Geography, Zadar
  • Rina Milošević Croatian Geographical Society, Zadar
  • Lovre Panđa University of Zadar, Department of Geography, Zadar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI2202147S

Keywords:

urban pluvial flood risk, risk perception factors, public perception survey

Abstract

Pluvial floods are rain-related floods that occur when water drainage is not fast enough due to heavy rainfall. One of the key components in the management of the urban pluvial flood risk (UPFR) is risk perception (RP). The objective of this paper was to define factors of RP based on the selected variables and to examine their reliability. Emphasis is placed on the contextualization of five factors related to cognition: awareness of the risk of pluvial floods (F1) and situation: anthropogenic causes of pluvial floods (F2), natural causes of pluvial floods (F3), consequences of pluvial floods in the future (F4), and preparedness for pluvial floods (F5). Furthermore, historical pluvial floods data were acquired from multiple sources and used to determine the distance of respondents' homes from frequently flooded places. The results showed that the questionnaire was consistent, i.e., factors are highly reliable. Significant differences were observed in the F2 regarding the gender of the respondents, and in the F4 regarding their age. Preparedness for the danger (F5) is the lowest perceived factor. Results from this study can facilitate communication between experts, decision-makers, and citizens.

Article metrics

References

Arisz, H., & Burrell, B. C. (2006, May). Urban Drainage Infrastructure Planning and Design Considering Climate Change. In 2006 IEEE EIC Climate Change Conference (pp. 1–9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EICCCC.2006.277251

Bertoša, M., & Matijašić, R. (Eds.). (2005). Istarska enciklopedija [Istrian Encyclopedia]. Leksikografski zavod Miroslav Krleža.

Birkholz, S., Muro, M., Jeffrey, P., & Smith, H. M. (2014). Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management. Science of the Total Environment, 478, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.061

Bradford, R. A., O'Sullivan, J. J., van der Craats, I. M., Krywkow, J., Rotko, P., Aaltonen, J., Bonaiuto, M., De Dominicis, S., Waylen, K., & Schelfaut, K. (2012). Risk perception – issues for flood management in Europe. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12(7), 2299–2309. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2299-2012

Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W., & Aerts, J. C. (2012). A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(9), 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x

Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J., Kreibich, H., & Aerts, J. C. (2013). Detailed insights into the influence of flood-coping appraisals on mitigation behavior. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1327–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.009

Buchecker, M., Salvini, G., Di Baldassarre, G., Semenzin, E., Maidl, E., & Marcomini, A. (2013). The role of risk perception in making flood risk management more effective. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(11), 3013–3030. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3013-2013

Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical Nonparametric Statistics (Vol. 350). John Wiley & Sons.

Croatian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Popis stanovništva 2011 [Census 2011]. https://web.dzs.hr/PXWeb/Menu.aspx?px_type=PX&px_db=Popis+stanovni%C5%A1tva+2011&px_language=

Croatian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Popis stanovništva 2021 [Census 2021]. https://popis2021.hr/

Croatian Geological Survey. (2009). Geološka karta Republike Hrvatske 1:300000 [Geologic map of Republic of Croatia 1:300000]. Hrvatski geološki institut, Zavod za geologiju.

Cvetković, V. M. (2016). Uticaj demografskih, socio-ekonomskih i psiholoških faktora na preduzimanje preventivnih mera [The Impact of Demographic, Socio-Economic and Psychological Factors on Preventative Measures]. Kultura polisa, 13(31), 393–404. https://kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/939

Frick, A., & Tervooren, S. (2019). A Framework for the Long-term Monitoring of Urban Green Volume Based on Multi-temporal and Multi-sensoral Remote Sensing Data. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 3(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-019-0030-5

Government of the Republic of Croatia. (2019). Procjena rizika od katastrofa za Republiku Hrvatsku [Disaster Risk Assessment for the Republic of Croatia]. https://civilna-zastita.gov.hr/UserDocsImages/DOKUMENTI_PREBACIVANJE/PLANSKI%20DOKUMENTI%20I%20UREDBE/Procjena%20rizika%20od%20katastrofa%20za%20RH.pdf

Grothmann, T., & Reusswig, F. (2006). People at Risk of Flooding: Why Some Residents Take Precautionary Action While Others Do Not. Natural Hazards, 38(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6

Harvatt, J., Petts, J., & Chilvers, J. (2011). Understanding householder responses to natural hazards: Flooding and sea‐level rise comparisons. Journal of Risk Research, 14(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.503935

Ho, M. C., Shaw, D., Lin, S., & Chiu, Y. C. (2008). How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception? Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 28(3), 635–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01040.x

Houston, D., Werrity, A., Bassett, D., Geddes, A., Hoolachan, A., & McMillan, M. (2011). Pluvial (rain-related) flooding in urban areas: The invisible hazard (Project Report). Joseph Rowntree Foundation. https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/pluvial-rain-related-flooding-urban-areas-invisible-hazard

Kienzler, S., Pech, I., Kreibich, H., Müller, M., & Thieken, A. H. (2015). After the extreme flood in 2002: Changes in preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany between 2005 and 2011. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15(3), 505–526. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-505-2015

Lee, H. C., Deng, C. Z., & Chen, H. (2021). Trust in Government, Social Determinants, and Resource Distribution after a Catastrophic Typhoon. Natural Hazards Review, 22(1), Article 04020050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000434

Liu, D., Li, Y., Shen, X., Xie, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Flood risk perception of rural households in western mountainous regions of Henan Province, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 27, 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.051

Maidl, E., & Buchecker, M. (2015). Raising risk preparedness by flood risk communication. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15(7), 1577–1595. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1577-2015

Marušić, M., & Prebežac, D. (2004). Tourist Market Research. Adeco.

Matošević, D., Poropat, M., Hrvatin, D., Kordić, V., Petrović, Đ., Simnonelli, N., Stipanov, D., & Milohanović M. (2018). Procjena rizika od velikih nesreća za Grad Poreč–Parenzo [Risk assessment of major accidents for the Town of Poreč–Parenzo]. http://www.porec.hr/sadrzaj/dokumenti/to%C4%8Dka%204.1.%20Procjena%20rizika%20od%20velikih%20nesre%C4%87a%20za%20Grad%20Pore%C4%8D-Parenzo.pdf

Netzel, L. M., Heldt, S., Engler, S., & Denecke, M. (2021). The importance of public risk perception for the effective management of pluvial floods in urban areas: A case study from Germany. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 14(2), Article e12688. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12688

Plapp, T., & Werner, U. (2006). Understanding risk perception from natural hazards: Examples from Germany. In W. J. Ammann, S. Dannenmann, & L. Vulliet (Eds.), RISK21 - Coping with Risks due to Natural Hazards in the 21st Century (pp. 101–108). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203963562

Qasim, S., Khan, A. N., Shrestha, R. P., & Qasim, M. (2015). Risk perception of the people in the flood prone Khyber Pukhthunkhwa province of Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14(4), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.001

Rana, I. A., & Routray, J. K. (2016). Actual vis-à-vis perceived risk of flood prone urban communities in Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19, 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.028

Rosenzweig, B. R., McPhillips, L., Chang, H., Cheng, C., Welty, C., Matsler, M., Iwaniec, D., & Davidson, C. I. (2018). Pluvial flood risk and opportunities for resilience. WIREs Water, 5(6), Article e1302. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1302

Samuels, P., & Gouldby, B. (2009). Language of Risk – Project Definitions (2nd ed., Report No. T32-04-01). FLOODsite. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:268e1ef4-7b45-4b4d-8504-13d2f252e4d9/datastream/OBJ/download

Siegrist, M. (2013). The necessity for longitudinal studies in risk perception research. Risk Analysis, 33(1), 50–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01941.x

Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2008). Natural Hazards and Motivation for Mitigation Behavior: People Cannot Predict the Affect Evoked by a Severe Flood. Risk Analysis, 28(3), 771–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01049.x

State Geodetic Administration. (2022). Hrvatska osnovna karta 1:5000 [Croatian base map 1:5000]. http://geoportal.dgu.hr/services/hok/wms

Šiljeg, S., Milošević, R., & Vilić, E. (2020). Multiscale GIS based Analysis of Urban Green Spaces (UGS) Accessibility: Case Study of Sisak (Croatia). In C. Grueau, R. Laurini, & L. Ragia (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management (pp. 240–245). SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009470802400245

Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33(6), 1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x

Wang, Y., Sun, M., & Song, B. (2017). Public perceptions of and willingness to pay for sponge town initiatives in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 122, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.002

Zenzerović, R., Škare, M., Blažević, S., Golja, T., & Kontošić, R. (2015). Strategija razvoja Grada Poreča-Parenzo za razdoblje od 2015. do 2020. godine [Development Strategy of the Town of Poreč-Parenzo for the period from 2015 to 2020]. Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli, Fakultet ekonomije i turizma. http://www.porec.hr/sadrzaj/dokumenti/Strategija%20gospodarskog%20razvoja%20Grada%20Pore%C4%8Da%20-%20Parenzo%202015.%20-%202020.%20godine.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-08-20

How to Cite

Šiljeg, S., Milošević, R., & Panđa, L. (2022). PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF THE URBAN PLUVIAL FLOODS RISK—CASE STUDY OF POREČ (CROATIA). Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 72(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI2202147S

Issue

Vol. 72 No. 2 (2022): Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA

Section

Original scientific article

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.